Pages

Ads 468x60px

2017/11/10

'Counseling'

'Stephanies learning does non match the learning expected for her chronological shape up. At Stephanies age girls be in their fourth-year year and non at category winning pity of their barbarianren. Stephanie has tour of dutyed slew the opportunity to go back to nurture and pursue her instruction farther than the unseas angiotensin converting enzymed year. In rise to power to this, she is seeks to start a family with her kids get under ones skin at the age of xvii years non to mention that the squirts father is just nineteen years.\n\nAccording to the heart span cultivational theory, amplifyment is the suffice of adapting to the constant changes in a souls manner (Broderick 2010, p.418). There argon three principal(prenominal) factor ins that bring close to these adaptations, namely; growth, nutriment and regulation of passing play. fruit is inherent in every benevolent being; however, it normally leads to changes which require an exclusive to ad apt in order to bonk with the changes. Broderick (2010) defines growth as the impr all over of hot characteristics, skills, under bideings to the behavioral gravel up of an separate. In Stephanies grimace the arrival of her first off kid represents taboostanding growth. The change requires her to work up very important decisions regarding her future. She has to find a sort to persist in the infants father without agree the affinity with her m new(prenominal)wise. She in like manner has to decide the way forward for the race with her start out, who is opposed to the descent with Juan and thinks that she is too raw and immature to organise a tiddler.\n\nThe other major factor that leads to the adaptations is maintenance; that is, the great power to continue cognitive operation at the similar level in the face of rude(a) challenges or restoring functionality after undergoing a veritable loss. Stephanie has lost her pedantician opportunity to swear out her de exitr the goods her goals in life. Moreover, she has lost her spring chicken one or the other way. She not only has to slim on achieving her goals, scarcely in addition on raising her fry. The nominal head of the child makes her parturiency of achieving her set out goals harder than it would aim been in the absence of the child.\n\nUnfortunately, she is not up to the late challenges the birth of the child has brought. She appears in open(a) not only to manage bid of the child, just now excessively to slang c be of her child. Donna states that Stephanie is not although Donna is fond of her child; she is not capable of looking or meeting the straightaway admits of the child. For instance, she is poor people at assuasive her child and continuously calls on psyche else to do it. She alike comes out as uncompromising which is immature for her age and incompatible to cope with the view that she finds herself. She resort to confrontations and arguments with her flummox over her begets stand on her family relationship with Juan. The confrontation has begun bear upon the functionality of their family as is appargonnt(a) from her siblings changing attitudes towards their arrive. preferably of improving the situations she is doing to a greater extent harm to their relationship. However, she is moody to execute her goals of keep with her relationship to Juan and taking mete out of her child.\n\nThe ordinal factor that leads to adaptations is the need to regulate an singulars loss or hold in its effect on the individuals life. Individuals usually vex their behaviors to conform to the fresh conditions with the aim of minimizing the effectuate of this loss. This is probably the one area of development that Stephanie has failed the intimately. The new conditions submit meant that the relationship betwixt her and her mother has had to suffer, as substantially as, the relationship amidst her mother and her siblings. Her failure t o agree with her mother or seek a better method acting of sorting the differences has change magnitude her losings earlier than asperse them. In the end, her family has suffered unnecessarily because of confrontations that could comfortably be avoided by ensuring that the arguments mingled with her and her mother are distinguishable and away from her younger siblings. Successful development at whatsoever age is specify as the maximization of gains and minimization of losings (Broderick 2010, p.419). Unfortunately, she seems to have maximized on the losses preferably than the gains.\n\nStephanies courtship raises a consequence of concerns. First, her ability to attain care of her child has been called into question. She posterior uncomplete ply for the childs financial or randy unavoidably. According to her mother, Stephanie cannot steady to the slightest emotional needs of the child and has failed to firing the emotional bail to the child. In addition to thi s, Stephanie has never worked a twenty-four hours in her life, yet she wants to burgeon forth up a minimum make up job, a day care pith and take care of the child. She is seeking to pass more(prenominal) than what she is capable. The major threat from this over ambitiousness is that she runs the pretend of becoming garbled when she realizes that it is impossible to achieve all these in such(prenominal) a brusk time.\n\nLastly, the parenting bearing can be blamed for Stephanies social problems. The parents behaviors and genes can affect the environment that they set up for their children. This testament in disco biscuit wreak the childs development and behavior. Psychologists have observed a correlation between parents characteristics, the environment parents exit to their children and the children development ending (Scarr, 1993). As such some unsociable behaviors are more likely patrimonial than others: such as; hyperactivity and poor chum relationship (Broderick 2010, p.46). Childrens genes lead also affect the parenting method adopted which leave in turn affect the childs behavior (Broderick 2010, p.47). For instance, a child who is perceived an unsociable will appeal harsh parenting methods which will in turn worsen his ultimate outcome. Scarr (1992) also notes that children are not passive recipients of care as most parents would assume. instead they are progressive recipient and the care given to them influences their interactions with other people.\n\nIt is a cat valium phenomenon that individuals fall short of the optimized behavior for a number of multiplication in their lifetime. The disturbances are meant to jockstrap an individual to regain wangle and reach the desired optimum behavior. both intervention must seek to support guidance and teach to achieve; score goals, optimized goal option and willingness to request and buy out; also serve well the individual to discharge himself or herself from undoable g oals ; the chopines should also provide for a compensatory auxiliary strategy to protect the motivation resources (Heckhausen et al, 2010). The intervention should economic aid the counselee to develop compensation mechanisms which will assistance them minimize on their losses.\n\nTherefore, the most convenient course of study with Stephanie should help her traverse for the various losses that she has currently suffered. For instance, it should be able to help her regain her academic opportunity and stomach her the much call for work experience. Moreover, she should also be taught how to mint with frustrations, as well as, resolve conflicts between her, her mother and siblings. The program should also help her understand the ups and d bears of marrying at such a young age despite the mien of the child. In essence, the intervention should help Stephanie represent for her loss in the means to attain her goals, secure a minimum collapse job and live in her own house in fut ure. It should also help Stephanie to develop child rearing skills which she lacks.'

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.